Popular Articles

Mystery Of Potentially Fatal Reaction To Smallpox Vaccine Unlocked By La Jolla Institute
Researchers from the La Jolla Institute for Allergy & Immunology have pinpointed the cellular defect that increases the likelihood, among eczema sufferers, of developing eczema vaccinatum, a severe and potentially fatal reaction to the smallpox vaccine. The research, conducted in mouse models, was funded under a special research network created by the National Institutes of Health in 2004. The network is working toward the development of a new smallpox vaccine that could be administered to the millions of Americans who suffer from atopic dermatitis, a chronic, itchy skin condition commonly referred to as eczema.
generic viagra online
Ohio Supreme Court Restricts Mifepristone Use In State To Scope Of FDA's Approval Letter
In answering two certified questions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, the Ohio State Supreme Court on July 1 declared that a state law regulating the use of mifepristone -- which is used in medication abortion -- bars physicians from prescribing it for off-label use, BNA reports. The court confirmed that doctors who use the drug to induce abortion must do so in compliance with the 49-day gestational limit included in FDA"s 2000 drug approval letter. Doctors also must prescribe the drug in accordance with the protocols and dosage indications included in its FDA-approved labeling.Interpretation of State Law in ContentionThe Ohio General Assembly in 2004 passed a law (Section 2919.123 (A)) that required any health care professional prescribing or dispensing mifepristone to comply with "all provisions of federal law that govern the use" of the drug. The law defines "federal law" as "any law, rule or regulation of the United States or any drug approval letter" from FDA "that governs or regulates the use of" mifepristone for inducing abortion. FDA"s approval letter states that the drug "is indicated for use in the termination of pregnancy (through 49 days" pregnancy) and has no other approved indication for use during pregnancy." In addition, the drug"s label states the recommended dosage and that its use requires three office visits by the patient. Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region challenged the law in district court, arguing that neither FDA"s approval letter nor any other federal provision bans the off-label use of mifespristone to induce abortion beyond 49 days" gestation. The group also argued that the state law was unconstitutionally vague because it did not notify abortion providers in advance regarding which FDA documents were included in the state"s criminal law. In addition, Planned Parenthood said that prohibiting the evidence-based use of the drug would infringe on the rights of women, requiring them to take higher-than-necessary dosages of the drug or to undergo surgical abortions when a noninvasive alternative is available. The district court ruled in favor of Planned Parenthood, saying that the law was void because of vagueness. The state appealed the decision to the 6th Circuit, which then submitted two questions to the state Supreme Court seeking its interpretation of the law.The state Supreme Court ruled that FDA"s drug approval letter is included in the definition of "federal law" and that the state law is not ambiguous, according to BNA. The court said that because the drug approval letter incorporated FDA"s labeling text, Ohio physicians cannot prescribe or provide mifepristone to induce abortion outside of the stipulations of the drug approval letter and approved label. According to BNA, product liability law experts say the ruling will not have an impact outside of mifepristone or the state of Ohio.Case Returns to Appeals CourtRoger Evans of Planned Parenthood Federation of America said that he is not sure if the court"s decision helps or hurts the group"s case. Evans said that the district court declared the law unconstitutional based on an interpretation that the statute operates in the same way the state Supreme Court ruled it does. He noted that there are other possible interpretations of the law that would have solved the constitutional issues at the center of the litigation. However, because those issues were not resolved, the case now returns to the 6th Circuit, which will decide if the statute is constitutional based on the state Supreme Court"s interpretation. If the circuit court agrees with the district court that the statute is unconstitutionally vague, the state of Ohio could seek a U.S. Supreme Court review. If the circuit court finds that the statute is constitutional, the case likely will be sent back to the district court for resolution of some other issues in the case, according to BNA (BNA, 7/6).
News of the day
GPs Have Difficulty Separating Those With And Without Depression In Primary Care
A meta-analysis of more than 50,000 patients has shown that general practitioners (GPs) continue to have difficulty separating those with and without depression, with substantial numbers missed and misidentified. GPs looking for depression make more misidentifications (false positives of depression) than the number of depressions they correctly spot following an initial consultation but accuracy could improved by re-assessment of people suspected of having depression. These are the conclusions of an Article published Online First and in an upcoming edition of The Lancet, written by Dr Alex Mitchell, Dr Amol Vaze, and Dr Sanajay Rao of Leicester Partnership Trust and University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Diagnostics

Investigating Role Of Brain Tumors In Deafness

Researchers at the Peninsula Medical School have received a grant of over ÷£39,000 from the charity Deafness Research UK, to investigate the role of brain tumours causing deafness in children and adults and the development of therapies using in vitro models. These tumours and a variety of other tumours are caused by mutations affecting a protein called merlin, which in turn cause cancers in a range of cell types including Schwann cells in the nervous system. Schwann cells produce the sheaths that surround and insulate neurons. Although the tumours are benign, they are frequent. They can be inherited and come in numbers. The sheer number of them can overwhelm a patient, often leading to deafness and eventually to death. Patients can suffer from 20 to 30 tumours at any one time, and the condition typically affects older children and young adults. No therapy, other than invasive surgery aiming at a single tumour and which may not eradicate the full extent of the tumours, exists. The hereditary condition affects one in every 2,500 people worldwide. It can affect any family, regardless of past history, through gene mutation and currently there is no cure. In some cases, pressure from the tumours affect the process of hearing leading to hearing loss or total deafness. The research will use a human acoustic neuroma in vitro model to identify how and why the tumours grow and eventually lead to hearing damage, and to test drug-based therapies designed to alleviate the problem. The research is led by Professor Oliver Hanemann, Chair of Clinical Neurobiology at the Peninsula Medical School. He said: "We have already achieved some success in re-profiling an existing drug called sorafenib by using the human in-cell model. The re-profiled drug has a positive affect on multiple brain tumours. As a consequence, we can go straight to clinical trials and introduce therapies to patients sooner rather than later using sorafenib or similar drugs.." Vivienne Michael, Chief Executive of Deafness Research UK, said: "This is clearly an important research project that could significantly improve the treatment available for those with acoustic neuroma and the charity is delighted to be funding it. Acoustic neuroma is worrying enough in its own right; when multiple tumours occur they need treating and traditional cancer therapies are not an option. Currently, treatment involves surgical removal of the tumours but this leads to damage of the auditory nerve and can cause total deafness with potentially devastating effects on the lives of those involved. "Great progress has been made in identifying target molecules for treatment, and this research will go a long way towards establishing the best potential drug for non-invasive therapy. Ultimately this would avoid the need for surgery and mean that people who currently face deafness as a result of acoustic neuroma would retain their hearing." Deafness Research UK is the only organisation totally dedicated to medical research of this type - researching treatments and cures for deafness, tinnitus, and other deafness-related conditions. Andrew Gould The Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry


Add your comment:
Name:
Site address: http://
Your message:
Enter today\\\\'s date, 2 digits
(spam protection):